2 results
Chapter 4 - The intermediate cases
- from Section 3 - The clinicals
-
- By Puneet Monga, Northwest Deanery Manchester, UK, Rajeev Bansal, Shoulder Fellow, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, UK
- Edited by Paul A. Banaszkiewicz, Deiary F. Kader
-
- Book:
- Postgraduate Orthopaedics
- Published online:
- 05 February 2012
- Print publication:
- 19 January 2012, pp 21-23
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Old versus new
The clinical exams underwent a major change in November 2009 with the introduction of the intermediate cases, which replaced the long case. Previously candidates were examined on a long case, with 30 minutes allocated for one case only. This long case would put fear into any candidate, and it represented 25% of your total mark! If you failed the long case, you generally failed the exam. Candidates had an opportunity to elicit a history and examine the patient, and this was then followed by a discussion with the examiners. The long case was removed as it was seen as unfair – if you had a really bad day, you had very little chance to redeem yourself. Candidates are now given intermediate cases and spend 15 minutes each on two patients. Each 15-minute slot is further subdivided roughly into 5 minutes each for history-taking, demonstrating appropriate clinical signs and discussion based on the particular case. As a word of warning, these 5 minute-slots are frequently not enforced by the examiners and you can easily mess the timing up. Certainly I spent about 1 minute on history in one of my intermediate cases and had to go back and ask more questions later! This is not good! Each subsection is marked equally, so it is important to get all the points in all the sections, which means trying to spend adequate time on all three sections. Don't rush the first two and lose easy marks and try and make it up in the discussion. The candidate is never left alone with the patient and all parts of the history and examinations are directly observed. There is a different set of examiners for each of the two intermediate cases. Candidates are allocated any case combinations, such as upper limb/lower limb, paeds/lower limb, lower limb/lower limb, etc.
Most candidates feel that this change is a positive step as it divides the risk. In the past, if a candidate performed poorly in the long case, it was extremely difficult to make this up in the rest of the examination sections as the long case was very heavily weighted. In the new system, even if one intermediate case doesn't go so well, it is easier to compensate elsewhere. Also, as the examiners are observing all the proceedings, they are able to empathize in situations where a patient is a poor historian or the clinical signs are difficult to elicit in a particular case. On the other hand, some candidates feel pressured for time, especially in a more complex case, and find themselves hurrying up and missing important points in the history and examination. Also, some candidates can find the presence of the examiners unnerving, with no scope for repeating and checking clinical signs. If you are unsure of a clinical sign, e.g. ACL rupture, then just re-examine the knee. This is what you would do in clinic, so do it in the exam – don't make it more difficult for yourself!
Improvement in nutrition-related knowledge and behaviour of urban Asian Indian school children: findings from the ‘Medical education for children/Adolescents for Realistic prevention of obesity and diabetes and for healthy aGeing’ (MARG) intervention study
- Priyali Shah, Anoop Misra, Nidhi Gupta, Daya Kishore Hazra, Rajeev Gupta, Payal Seth, Anand Agarwal, Arun Kumar Gupta, Arvind Jain, Atul Kulshreshta, Nandita Hazra, Padmamalika Khanna, Prasann Kumar Gangwar, Sunil Bansal, Pooja Tallikoti, Indu Mohan, Rooma Bhargava, Rekha Sharma, Seema Gulati, Swati Bharadwaj, Ravindra Mohan Pandey, Kashish Goel
-
- Journal:
- British Journal of Nutrition / Volume 104 / Issue 3 / 14 August 2010
- Published online by Cambridge University Press:
- 07 April 2010, pp. 427-436
- Print publication:
- 14 August 2010
-
- Article
-
- You have access Access
- HTML
- Export citation
-
Increasing prevalence of childhood obesity calls for comprehensive and cost-effective educative measures in developing countries such as India. School-based educative programmes greatly influence children's behaviour towards healthy living. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a school-based health and nutritional education programme on knowledge and behaviour of urban Asian Indian school children. Benchmark assessment of parents and teachers was also done. We educated 40 196 children (aged 8–18 years), 25 000 parents and 1500 teachers about health, nutrition, physical activity, non-communicable diseases and healthy cooking practices in three cities of North India. A pre-tested questionnaire was used to assess randomly selected 3128 children, 2241 parents and 841 teachers before intervention and 2329 children after intervention. Low baseline knowledge and behaviour scores were reported in 75–94 % government and 48–78 % private school children, across all age groups. A small proportion of government school children gave correct answers about protein (14–17 %), carbohydrates (25–27 %) and saturated fats (18–32 %). Private school children, parents and teachers performed significantly better than government school subjects (P < 0·05). Following the intervention, scores improved in all children irrespective of the type of school (P < 0·001). A significantly higher improvement was observed in younger children (aged 8–11 years) as compared with those aged 12–18 years, in females compared with males and in government schools compared with private schools (P < 0·05 for all). Major gaps exist in health and nutrition-related knowledge and behaviour of urban Asian Indian children, parents and teachers. This successful and comprehensive educative intervention could be incorporated in future school-based health and nutritional education programmes.